YIAGA Africa, a Civil Society Organization has opposed the proposal to scrap the State Independent Electoral Commissions (SIECs) and transfer their duties to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). It cautions that the action could be counterproductive and weaken decentralisation by suffocating the INEC.

Last month, the Attorney General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, proposed that state independent electoral commissions (SIECs) be abolished and their functions centralised to the INEC, stating that the state governors are abusing the electoral system in their states by influencing the state electoral bodies. He described the elections held in local governments as coronations instead of proper polls.

Similarly, the AGF, last week, dragged the states to the Supreme Court seeking full autonomy of the local governments for all-inclusive government. Due to this some political pundits and civil society organisations have supported the call of the Federal Government to abolish state electoral bodies and saddle INEC with the responsibility.

However, YIAGA Africa in a statement signed by its Executive Director, Mr Sampson Itodo stated that if the policy is implemented, it will hurt Nigeria’s 25-year democracy, as the decision is overly broad and may undermine the autonomy of states guaranteed by the Constitution, potentially leading to an overconcentration of power in the federal government. He said the move could weaken local democracy and citizen participation because local communities would be denied the opportunity to participate in decision-making.

Defending the retention of SIECs in the states, Mr. Itodo stated that “the abolition of SIECs contradicts the constitutional principle of state autonomy. The Constitution provides for a federal structure that ensures the devolution of powers to the states. By centralizing the conduct of local government elections under INEC, the proposal undermines this federal structure. It erodes the autonomy of the states, leading to an unconstitutional overconcentration of power at the federal level. Eliminating SIECs would weaken the state’s capacity for self-governance.

“At a time, when the demand for local government autonomy enjoys national consensus, scrapping SIECs is a contradiction and undermines the principles of federalism which hinges on devolution of power. INEC’s current mandate is extensive and demands substantial resources. and attention. The Commission is overburdened with numerous responsibilities such as conducting a significant number of elections in a general election year, including off-cycle governorship elections, bye-elections, and re-run elections. The commission is perpetually occupied throughout the electoral cycle with registration and regulation of political parties, voter registration, production of election materials and guidelines, and candidate nomination.

“Adding the responsibility of conducting local government elections would further strain the Commission, potentially leading to administrative inefficiencies and reduced effectiveness in managing electoral processes. This excessive burden would compromise the integrity of elections, contravening the fundamental right to free and fair elections as guaranteed by the Constitution.

“Undoubtedly, SIECs have been underwhelming since the return to democracy in 1999 due to capture by state governors, weak or ineffective legal framework, underfunding, and limited election administration capabilities. These factors have resulted in poorly conducted and flawed local council elections. Yiaga Africa’s position is that while the calls for abolishing SIECs are understandable, there’s no antidote to flawed LGA elections. The proposal fails to address the underlying causes of ‘electoral coronation’ masquerading as elections at the local level.

The statement further submitted that “Transferring the responsibilities of SIECs to INEC is akin to treating the symptoms rather than the root cause. In an electoral context defined by executive lawlessness, electoral impunity, and ineffective accountability measures, abolishing SIECs would not fix the problem of bad elections at the LGA level or promote local government autonomy. Rather than scrap SIECS, the National Assembly and executive should consider implementing stricter sanctions or legislation that criminalize the dissolution of local government councils including withholding federal allocation to states that fail to conduct Local Government elections or guarantee the operational and financial independence of SIECs.

Rather than scraping the state electoral bodies, Mr Itodo preferred alternative solutions as a pathway to strengthening electoral democracy at the local government level.

He called for a constitutional amendment to “safeguard the operational, administrative and financial independence of SIECs. Ensure that the power of the SIECs to make its own rules and regulate procedures should not be subject to the approval or control of governors, thereby protecting their autonomy.

“Address the ambiguity regarding the tenure of Local Government Chairmen and councilors through constitutional amendments to minimize arbitrary dissolutions of local governments by Governors supported by state legislatures. Establish clear timelines for making appointments into SIECs.

“Introduce additional mechanisms for equitable devolution of power to state and local government, including laws that empower local governments with greater administrative and fiscal autonomy.

“It is imperative for state assemblies to enact a robust legal framework for SIEC activities, including guidelines for conducting elections, dispute resolution procedures, and penalties for electoral misconduct. State electoral laws must be harmonized with the provisions of the 2022 Electoral Act to ensure uniformity and legal coherence.

“SIECs should invest in capacity development to improve the quality of election administration at the state level. This includes training for electoral officers, acquisition of modern electoral technologies, and improvement of administrative processes.

“Political parties, civil society organizations, and media organizations should take immediate measures to conduct extensive voter education and civic engagement initiatives at the local level to encourage citizen participation in local government elections”, he said.