CCT Convicts Onnoghen, Bars Him from Public Office for 10 Years

CCT Convicts Onnoghen, Bars Him from Public Office for 10 Years

…Confiscates Account in Five Banks The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) in Abuja has convicted Justice Walter Onnoghen, suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) for false and non-assets declaration levelled against him by the Federal Government. The Tribunal also found Onnoghen guilty of violation of the code of conduct for public officers. CCT Chairman, Mr

…Confiscates Account in Five Banks

The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) in Abuja has convicted Justice Walter Onnoghen, suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) for false and non-assets declaration levelled against him by the Federal Government. The Tribunal also found Onnoghen guilty of violation of the code of conduct for public officers.

CCT Chairman, Mr Danladi Umar, in a judgment on Thursday, held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Onnoghen is guilty.

CCT says it has jurisdiction to try Onnoghen whom it says made false asset declaration by deliberately omitting to declare the five domiciliary accounts he maintained with Standard Chartered Bank, and in which huge deposits were found.

The Tribunal after convicting him, ordered among others, his removal from office, barred him from holding public office for the next 10 years and confiscated the funds in the five accounts, which it said should be forfeited to the Federal Government.

Umar held that Onnoghen’s claim of mistakes and forgetfulness as responsible for his failure to declare his five domiciliary accounts with the Standard Chattered Bank was a breach of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Code of Tribunal Act.

According to the CCT chairman, Onnoghen’s confessional statement amounted to acceptance of the crime.

“The tribunal having considered the evidence of the parties, it becomes crystal clear that the defendant contravened the provisions of the CCB and CCT Act.”

Umar held that the defendant particularly violated the provisions of Section 23(2) of the Code of Conduct for Public officer. He however said Onnoghen was not found guilty as a judicial officer but as a public officer.

In pronouncing his sentence after the defendant’s plea for mercy failed, Umar went ahead to order the forfeiture of the monies domiciled in the five accounts not declared to the federal government.

Umar also ordered that Onnoghen be barred from holding any public office within the period of 10 years.

Ruling on the motion filed by the defendant challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal, Umar held that the Tribunal was a creation of the Constitution specifically aimed at adjudicating on petitions arising from allegations of non-asset declaration.

He therefore, said the motion lacked merit as the Tribunal had jurisdiction to try all public office holders including erring judicial officers.

“The power of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, is well established in the constitution to try the CJN and others like him.”

“Let it be made clear here that the defendant was charged as a public officer and not as a judicial officer in accordance with paragraph five of the 5th Schedule of the constitution.”

“The Tribunal hereby over rules itself in the judgment of Justice Sylvester Ngwuta, Justice of the Supreme where it declined jurisdiction to set him free.”

“In that judgment, the Tribunal had erroneously held that it could not try Ngwuta because the National Judicial Council (NJC) had not treated the matter.”

“The fact of the matter is that the Tribunal could try any erring judicial officer because they have dual status of being public officers and judicial officers,’’ Umar said.

On the motion for the chairman of the Tribunal to recuse himself on account of glaring bias, Umar declined that prayer and dismissed the motion.”

The defendant had in that motion alleged that Umar has pending charges brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Umar, however, said it was foolhardy for anyone to contemplate that he had pending charges drafted against him by the EFCC.

According to him, the anti-graft Commission has completed the bribery investigation against him and found him not liable.

He also said it was surprising for the defence team to hold that he was biased and took instructions from the presidency.

“The Tribunal is satisfied with the evidence before it that the defendant failed to declare all his assets after he was sworn in as the CJN.”

“The Tribunal has examined the hard facts, the prosecution has discharged the onus placed on it without any iota of doubt.”

“On the whole, the defendant has breached the Code of Conduct Bureau and Code of Tribunal Act and is therefore guilty of the six-count charge levied against him,’’ Umar said.

Speaking to newsmen after the session, Mr Okon Efut, SAN, Counsel to Onnoghen said the entire process was shrouded in secrecy, adding that the judgment was passed when his client was suspended without due diligence.

He said the Judiciary and democracy had been degraded, adding that the decision would be challenged at the Court of Appeal.

“Justice may be slow as it grinds gently but steadily we obtain justice and equity,” Efut said.

Onnoghen, who was Nigeria’s 17th Chief Justice, was arraigned by the Code of Conduct Bureau, following a petition brought against him by a group, the Anti-Corruption and Research Based Data Initiative, headed by a member of the ruling All Progressives Congress in Enugu State, Denis Aghanya.

Onnoghen was later charged on six counts, for allegedly failing to declare some of his accounts in the asset declaration form submitted to the CCB in December, 2016.

According to the charge, Onnoghen also failed to declare his assets after the expiration of his declaration form filled in 2005.

Onnoghen’s trials started when a petition was filed by the civil rights group at the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) alleging that he owns ” sundry accounts primarily funded through cash deposits made by himself up to as recently as Aug. 10, 2016, which appear to have been run in a manner inconsistent with financial transparency and the code of conduct for public officials.”

The trial commenced on Jan, 14, 2019 at the Code of Conduct Tribunal but Onnoghen was absent. The case was then adjourned to the following week because Onnoghen faulted the summons procedure.

The next hearing was slated for Jan. 22, 2019 but he failed to show up in court again.

Following his absence again, President Muhammadu Buhari suspended him on Jan. 26 and appointed Tanko Ibrahim as acting Chief Justice of Nigeria.

Posts Carousel

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Latest Posts

Top Authors

Most Commented

Featured Videos